Take My Muffin
1224 Neutral
(@tmm_eth OR $MUFFIN) lang:en -is:retweet
1201
Neutral
↑ +31 above avg
avg ethos(159 never seen before)
1490
supporters
48.1/day· 2.1× avg
0
skeptics
0.00/day· 0.00× avg
2717
positive tweets
87.6/day· 60% above avg
0
negative tweets
0.00/day· 0.00× avg
5000
tweets scanned
161/day· ≈ avg
2026-04-01 → 2026-05-01
window
31 days
Audience composition vs baseline(avg across 29 projects)
29%with reviews
↑ 15% above avg
61%no reviews
↓ 10% below avg
11%never seen
↓ 5% below avg
Penny · 18.7K followers
- May 5th is shaping up to be an important date for $MUFFIN as it's the date officially chosen for the token to go live. What makes this a bit different from the usual token launch is the way it’s been set up. The team behind it, @TMM_ETH, didn’t start with a token first. They focused on building out their IP and ecosystem, reportedly putting in over $15M on the Web2 side before bringing things on-chain. If you minted Korneys earlier (which was free), that’s actually your entry point here. Holding them in your wallet is what qualifies you for the $MUFFIN airdrop on May 5. They’ve also mentioned backing or alignment with names like @1inch, @TornadoCash, and @BinanceWallet, which adds a bit more weight compared to a typical early-stage launch. The part that’s catching attention is the gap between the reported scale of what’s been built and the relatively low TGE cap being discussed. That’s where people are seeing potential upside though, as always, it depends on execution after launch. Overall, it’s one of those setups where early participants are already in position, and now it’s just a matter of how things play out once the token goes live. If you’re curious, you can check it out here: https://t.co/oTA6Rpv0jt2026-04-25♥ 1↻ 0sentiment 90%
- @WessWeb3 @tmm_eth Looking forward to it2026-04-25♥ 1↻ 0sentiment 70%
Supporters · 1490
ranked by ethos (highest first) · click any face
Recognized · 426
4
4
4
2
2
2
6
5
2
8
2
4
5
4
2
6
9
3
3
6
14
5
2
2
2
2
2
8
2
3
4
4
4
2
2
4
23
3
2
2
3
3
2
2
9
4
2
4
5
4
2
3
2
2
2
2
6
2
12
3
2
3
6
2
2
2
4
3
12
8
6
2
11
4
2
6
2
2
3
2
6
4
2
2
2
8
2
3
18
6
3
2
2
2
4
2
2
3
3
12
48
2
2
7
3
2
6
3
7
3
5
5
2
4
2
2
8
3
3
7
3
2
4
3
8
4
3
2
3
2
4
3
2
2
4
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
4
2
2
8
2
72
2
No Ethos reviews · 905
lower signal
6
4
12
4
3
2
3
3
2
2
2
4
9
2
2
4
3
2
3
6
4
2
8
7
3
2
4
4
3
9
5
2
13
11
8- 8
4
7
6
4
3
3
2
2
10
13
2
5
5
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
29
5
5
4
3
2
2
8
8
4
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
8
5
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
3
2
2
2
7
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
7
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
7
6
6
6
5
4
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
6
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
20
8
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2- 2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
20
13
8
5
5
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
3
3
3
5
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
8
5
5
4
3
2
2- 2
2
2
2
2
Never seen before · 159
lowest signal
ethos:Untrusted< 800Questionable800–1199Neutral1200–1399Known1400–1599Established1600–1799Reputable1800–1999Exemplary2000–2199Distinguished2200–2399Revered2400–2599Renowned2600+Never seen before