Pharos Network
1281 Neutral
(@pharos_network OR $PROS) lang:en -is:retweet
1077
Questionable
↓ -93 below avg
avg ethos(398 never seen before)
907
supporters
60.5/day· 2.6× avg
0
skeptics
0.00/day· 0.00× avg
1369
positive tweets
91.3/day· 67% above avg
0
negative tweets
0.00/day· 0.00× avg
5000
tweets scanned
333/day· 2.3× avg
2026-04-17 → 2026-05-01
window
15 days
Audience composition vs baseline(avg across 29 projects)
3%with reviews
↓ 11% below avg
53%no reviews
↓ 17% below avg
44%never seen
↑ 28% above avg
- @Kiwi_Nod @pharos_network Pharos model: Content is evaluated Signal is ranked Rewards are direct (on-chain) Result: Signal compounds2026-05-01♥ 1↻ 0sentiment 92%
- @Kiwi_Nod @pharos_network Old system: Visibility = algorithm bias Virality = randomness Value = indirect Result: Noise wins2026-05-01♥ 1↻ 0sentiment 85%
- @Kiwi_Nod @pharos_network Let’s break the model most are still operating in ↓2026-05-01♥ 1↻ 0sentiment 72%
- @Kiwi_Nod @pharos_network Most content compete for attention. Pharos is turning attention into infrastructure. That’s the difference people are missing. When attention becomes: → measurable → rankable → rewardable on-chain KiwiNod isn’t rewarding noise. It’s indexing signal. @2026-05-01♥ 1↻ 0sentiment 88%
Supporters · 907
ranked by ethos (highest first) · click any face
Recognized · 27
No Ethos reviews · 482
lower signal
Never seen before · 398
lowest signal
ethos:Untrusted< 800Questionable800–1199Neutral1200–1399Known1400–1599Established1600–1799Reputable1800–1999Exemplary2000–2199Distinguished2200–2399Revered2400–2599Renowned2600+Never seen before