Near
1595 Known
(@nearprotocol OR $NEAR) -is:retweet
1165
Questionable
≈ avg
avg ethos(553 never seen before)
2872
supporters
82.1/day· 3.6× avg
567
skeptics
16.2/day· 4.7× avg
7211
positive tweets
206/day· 3.8× avg
1158
negative tweets
33.1/day· 4.3× avg
15041
tweets scanned
430/day· 2.9× avg
2026-05-01 → 2026-06-04
window
35 days
Audience composition vs baseline(avg across 29 projects)
9%with reviews
↓ 5% below avg
75%no reviews
↑ 5% above avg
16%never seen
≈ avg
CHEX Dude Number 1 · 51 followers
- Is near(.)com and @near_intents going to become a major player in the nascent native #BTCfi sector? $near2026-06-04♥ 1↻ 0sentiment 65%
- Perps are available on near(.)com now👀 Seems big. $NEAR Is $RHEA involved?2026-06-04♥ 1↻ 0sentiment 72%
- @arthur0x Hey Arthur, Near Intents are the easiest and quickest to move value across all of cryptodom, hands down. My question is, are they a competitor to bridges such as CCIP and wormhole, or a facilitator? I would use Near Intents over Chainlink's transporter any day. $NEA2026-06-04♥ 1↻ 0sentiment 70%
- @NEARProtocol Your have such a great product with Confidential Near Intents on near(.)com. It's a surreal experience trading non-wrapped assets from various blockchains all with the ease-of-heart one has when not being watched, and with UX that is actually a joy to use (unheard2026-06-04♥ 0↻ 0sentiment 88%
- @cryptgodog21 I agree, the $NEAR product is currently severely under appreciated. Confidential Near Intents are just a pleasure to use with so much applicability. As or $RHEA, Hyperliquid perp integration is huge, too. Looking to see how much traction it gets.2026-06-03♥ 0↻ 0sentiment 80%
- @NEARLegion So good. I'm just buying and selling on near(.)com for the feels right now. To heck with any fees. Confidential chain abstraction and all that that entails, including no tedious bridging and wallet fiddling... Feels good man. $NEAR2026-06-03♥ 1↻ 0sentiment 80%
- Can @near_intents become the privacy layer for all of crypto? Why can't an app offering privacy functionality on Eth, Sol, etc anonymise sender and receiver by routing through the powerful combination of ultra-fast chain abstraction and Confidential Near Intents? $NEAR2026-05-31♥ 0↻ 0sentiment 72%
- Anyone using AI for health, e.g. blood work, sickness diagnoses and especially DNA analysis, should be using confidential AI through @near_ai. Don't give this highly personal data, and in the case of DNA, your children's data(!) to big tech to hold forever and monetise. $NEAR2026-05-31♥ 0↻ 0sentiment 78%
- @laurashin @kaiynne @tayvano_ @LucaNetz @ilblackdragon I feel that Confidential Near Intents are such a 0-1 moment in crypto that not enough people see or talk about. $NEAR2026-05-31♥ 0↻ 0sentiment 75%
- A big story for $NEAR. Confidential Intents are about to become the default. Which means as @near_intents unifies liquidity across crypto through chain abstraction, so too will confidential transactions become the default across the entire crypto industry. An inflection point.2026-05-29♥ 0↻ 0sentiment 80%
- @familiarcow @ilblackdragon This is amazing! An inflection point for all of cryptodom! $NEAR2026-05-29♥ 0↻ 0sentiment 78%
- @ilblackdragon What do you think about deposits to near(.)com going to Confidential mode by default? Nobody willingly has every transaction exposed to everyone till the end of time. The default in most aspects of life is to privacy, all things being equal. $NEAR2026-05-27♥ 3↻ 0sentiment 72%
Supporters · 2872
ranked by ethos (highest first) · click any face
Recognized · 260
No Ethos reviews · 2131
lower signal
3
10
2
2
4
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
7
12
7
2
5
3
2
2
4
2
2
13
6
4
3
9
5
3
2
2
3
5
11
6
10
8
2
2
2
2
9
2
5
4
4
2
2
7
3
2
2
2
12
6
16
13
10
7
6
6
6
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
3
3
2
11
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
8
6
5
2
2
2
19
5
4
4
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
23
10
7
5
4
4
2
2
2
29
12
5
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
15
5
5
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
7
6
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
6
6
6
5
5
4
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
26
16
12
11
9
9
7
7
7
6
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
7
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
10
4
2
2
2
2
14
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
101
27
9
8
7
6
5
5
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
92
41
36
30
30
27
25
25
22
20
18
17
15
14
14
14
13
13
12
11
11
11
11
10
10
10
10
8
8
7
7
7
7
6
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
84
51
48
33
27
25
24
23
23
23
22
22
21
21
21
20
20
19
19
19
19
19
18
18
18
18
18
18
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
16
16
16
16
15
15
15
15
15
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
12
12
12
12
12
12
12- 12
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
9
9
9
8
8
8
8
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
26
2
11
3
6
4
3
3
3
63
24
24
19
18
14
14
11
7
7
7
7
6
6
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
17
9
7
7
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Never seen before · 481
lowest signal
ethos:Untrusted< 800Questionable800–1199Neutral1200–1399Known1400–1599Established1600–1799Reputable1800–1999Exemplary2000–2199Distinguished2200–2399Revered2400–2599Renowned2600+Never seen before