Near
1595 Known
(@nearprotocol OR $NEAR) -is:retweet
1165
Questionable
≈ avg
avg ethos(553 never seen before)
2872
supporters
82.1/day· 3.6× avg
567
skeptics
16.2/day· 4.7× avg
7211
positive tweets
206/day· 3.8× avg
1158
negative tweets
33.1/day· 4.3× avg
15041
tweets scanned
430/day· 2.9× avg
2026-05-01 → 2026-06-04
window
35 days
Audience composition vs baseline(avg across 29 projects)
9%with reviews
↓ 5% below avg
75%no reviews
↑ 5% above avg
16%never seen
≈ avg
sahilswan (⋈) · 62 followers
- @rhea_finance @HyperliquidX @near_intents @NEARProtocol Finally someone built the perp experience we’ve all been begging for-one wallet, one click, trade anything anywhere without the usual bridge roulette or gas token headaches. Hyperliquid liquidity + NEAR abstraction is such a2026-06-03♥ 3↻ 0sentiment 80%
- @anglio Been watching $NEAR quietly building while most alts are dead. Real usage, solid tech, and the team just keeps shipping. Everything else feels like noise right now.Already heavy on NEAR and adding on dips. When BTC wakes up, this one’s gonna fly. LFG2026-06-02♥ 0↻ 0sentiment 90%
- @rektmando Dropped privacy+cross-chain swaps in a bear market while others were just memeing. Volume holding steady and fees buying back tokens? That’s real product-market fit. The buyback from fees is the cherry on top too. $NEAR Quietly cooking while the timeline is distracted.2026-06-02♥ 0↻ 0sentiment 82%
- @Grayscale @NEARProtocol @LowBeta Finally Grayscale dropping some real alpha on NEAR Been watching them quietly build through the bear while everyone chased hype. The AI agents+intents combo makes sense here not just another buzzword narrative. That inflation cut timing is chef’2026-05-29♥ 3↻ 0sentiment 85%
- @JesusMartinez @NEARProtocol @elliot_braem @NEARFoundation Everyone’s chasing smarter models but nobody’s talking about who actually owns your data or how agents are gonna move money without selling you out. Privacy angle on AI is actually important and NEAR seems to be building2026-05-29♥ 2↻ 0sentiment 75%
- @noir_wallet @rhea_finance @near_intents @NEARProtocol This is actually clean Oneclick collateral in wallet swaps with full ZEC privacy? No more bridge anxiety or clunky flows.The Near Intents integration for smooth chain abstraction is a really smart touch too.Finally feels like2026-05-28♥ 2↻ 0sentiment 80%
- $Near Farming 142.37 🚀 https://t.co/ZQo2XA0Qzu2026-05-28♥ 13↻ 1sentiment 75%
- @CryptoTubeYT This is actually huge. Privacy was the biggest missing piece for AI agents now NEAR’s Confidential Intents let them move without leaking everything. $15M TVL in just 3 months shows real demand. Quietly building something special. Bullish on $NEAR2026-05-27♥ 2↻ 0sentiment 88%
- @CryptoHayes Arthur still bullish on $NEAR after all this time man’s been early before, and the AI + chain usage is actually picking up for real. Long way to go sounds about right, still feels early af.2026-05-25♥ 1↻ 0sentiment 75%
- @Cointelegraph Arthur cooking with $NEAR again.been watching it quietly build out the best AI infra play in the space. Not just hype - actual usage and devs are flowing in. This one feels different from the usual noise."2026-05-25♥ 0↻ 0sentiment 85%
Supporters · 2872
ranked by ethos (highest first) · click any face
Recognized · 260
No Ethos reviews · 2131
lower signal
3
10
2
2
4
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
7
12
7
2
5
3
2
2
4
2
2
13
6
4
3
9
5
3
2
2
3
5
11
6
10
8
2
2
2
2
9
2
5
4
4
2
2
7
3
2
2
2
12
6
16
13
10
7
6
6
6
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
3
3
2
11
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
8
6
5
2
2
2
19
5
4
4
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
23
10
7
5
4
4
2
2
2
29
12
5
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
15
5
5
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
7
6
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
6
6
6
5
5
4
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
26
16
12
11
9
9
7
7
7
6
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
7
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
10
4
2
2
2
2
14
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
101
27
9
8
7
6
5
5
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
92
41
36
30
30
27
25
25
22
20
18
17
15
14
14
14
13
13
12
11
11
11
11
10
10- 10
10
8
8
7
7
7
7
6
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
84
51
48
33
27
25
24
23
23
23
22
22
21
21
21
20
20
19
19
19
19
19
18
18
18
18
18
18
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
16
16
16
16
15
15
15
15
15
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
9
9
9
8
8
8
8
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
26
2
11
3
6
4
3
3
3
63
24
24
19
18
14
14
11
7
7
7
7
6
6
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
17
9
7
7
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Never seen before · 481
lowest signal
ethos:Untrusted< 800Questionable800–1199Neutral1200–1399Known1400–1599Established1600–1799Reputable1800–1999Exemplary2000–2199Distinguished2200–2399Revered2400–2599Renowned2600+Never seen before