Near
1595 Known
(@nearprotocol OR $NEAR) -is:retweet
1165
Questionable
≈ avg
avg ethos(553 never seen before)
2872
supporters
82.1/day· 3.6× avg
567
skeptics
16.2/day· 4.7× avg
7211
positive tweets
206/day· 3.8× avg
1158
negative tweets
33.1/day· 4.3× avg
15041
tweets scanned
430/day· 2.9× avg
2026-05-01 → 2026-06-04
window
35 days
Audience composition vs baseline(avg across 29 projects)
9%with reviews
↓ 5% below avg
75%no reviews
↑ 5% above avg
16%never seen
≈ avg
Neuromancer · 2.4K followers
- Knew it. Out of $near until OI bottoms.2026-06-04♥ 2↻ 1sentiment 85%
- $near is smoking right now. This is pretty cool.2026-06-03♥ 2↻ 0sentiment 75%
- @rhea_finance @HyperliquidX @near_intents @NEARProtocol so slick.2026-06-03♥ 0↻ 0sentiment 70%
- Starting to dislike holding $near. Something feels off but I cant quite figure it out.2026-06-01♥ 8↻ 0sentiment 75%
- As Venice build up users, it validates near's technology. A great correlated play. A movie called Conan the Barbarian describes this via metaphor. $vvv $near Steel = validated paying users. Men = KOLs Women = your X feed Beasts = ETFs + Saylor. https://t.co/DhokgV2gRv2026-05-31♥ 9↻ 0sentiment 75%
- This is why you don't trust beta garbage like gitlawb. NEVER. $near and $vvv are the only stable deAI ecosystems. You are ALWAYS better just betting the leader with ethical leaders that aren't unstable and crazy. These were known ruggers to.2026-05-26♥ 2↻ 0sentiment 85%
- $near has a lot of room to run. Intents is a serious business that drives a lot of value. I estimate a fair repricing to about $8 is logical, but you can dream to. 😉2026-05-25♥ 6↻ 0sentiment 75%
Supporters · 2872
ranked by ethos (highest first) · click any face
Recognized · 260
No Ethos reviews · 2131
lower signal
3
10
2
2
4
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
7
12
7
2
5
3
2
2
4
2
2
13
6
4
3
9
5
3
2
2
3
5
11
6
10
8
2
2
2
2
9
2
5
4
4
2
2
7
3
2
2
2
12
6
16
13
10
7
6
6
6
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
3
3
2
11
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
8
6
5
2
2
2
19
5
4
4
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
23
10
7
5
4
4
2
2
2
29
12
5
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
15
5
5
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
7
6
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
6
6
6
5
5
4
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
26
16
12
11
9
9
7
7
7
6
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
- 7
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
10
4
2
2
2
2
14
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
101
27
9
8
7
6
5
5
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
92
41
36
30
30
27
25
25
22
20
18
17
15
14
14
14
13
13
12
11
11
11
11
10
10
10
10
8
8
7
7
7
7
6
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
84
51
48
33
27
25
24
23
23
23
22
22
21
21
21
20
20
19
19
19
19
19
18
18
18
18
18
18
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
16
16
16
16
15
15
15
15
15
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
9
9
9
8
8
8
8
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
26
2
11
3
6
4
3
3
3
63
24
24
19
18
14
14
11
7
7
7
7
6
6
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
17
9
7
7
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Never seen before · 481
lowest signal
ethos:Untrusted< 800Questionable800–1199Neutral1200–1399Known1400–1599Established1600–1799Reputable1800–1999Exemplary2000–2199Distinguished2200–2399Revered2400–2599Renowned2600+Never seen before