Near
1595 Known
(@nearprotocol OR $NEAR) -is:retweet
1165
Questionable
≈ avg
avg ethos(553 never seen before)
2872
supporters
82.1/day· 3.6× avg
567
skeptics
16.2/day· 4.7× avg
7211
positive tweets
206/day· 3.8× avg
1158
negative tweets
33.1/day· 4.3× avg
15041
tweets scanned
430/day· 2.9× avg
2026-05-01 → 2026-06-04
window
35 days
Audience composition vs baseline(avg across 29 projects)
9%with reviews
↓ 5% below avg
75%no reviews
↑ 5% above avg
16%never seen
≈ avg
baldyboi · 1.6K followers
- Yes, this what i was talking about too.. everyone sees that Arthur is scammer.. Recent scam was $NEAR2026-06-04♥ 0↻ 0sentiment 85%
- Last time when he said $NEAR going do 10x, he sold few days later under $3 with +30% since that post. Now @CryptoHayes saying this about $WLD previous times was with $ZEC then crashed from 700 to 200 and $RIVER from 80 to 8, and many time more before He is serial So you need to2026-06-04♥ 2↻ 1sentiment 80%
- near:native starting looking strong at this market dump, because @saylor sold 32 $BTC, so bought more $NEAR at 2.4, and added little more $MON at 0.0225 Looking at $LIT, maybe continues run, maybe follows $HYPE at some point Or what if we finally going have alt season?2026-06-01♥ 0↻ 0sentiment 70%
- $near looks insane, still more to go https://t.co/IS9N6iTUlK2026-05-25♥ 0↻ 0sentiment 80%
- I’m holding $near with avg 1.9, and openend 3x long at 2.77, hoping got not too late in this train, technically have 35% portfolio in near, sold $mon for near too, now thinking maybe its time sell $zec $hype leftovers for near. maybe even sell $mega and $vvv2026-05-25♥ 0↻ 0sentiment 75%
- Better was if I justed added more $near, instead $mon, because monad looks like nobody buying, wont go up, any time soon2026-05-25♥ 0↻ 0sentiment 72%
Supporters · 2872
ranked by ethos (highest first) · click any face
Recognized · 260
No Ethos reviews · 2131
lower signal
3
10
2
2
4
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
7
12
7
2
5
3
2
2
4
2
2
13
6
4
3
9
5
3
2
2
3
5
11
6
10
8
2
2
2
2
9
2
5
4
4
2
2
7
3
2
2
2
12
6
16
13
10
7
6
6
6
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
3
3
2
11
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
8
6
5
2
2
2
19
5
4
4
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
23
10
7
5
4
4
2
2
2
29
12
5
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
15
5
5
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
7
6
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
6
6
6
5
5
4
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
26
16
12
11
9
9
7
7
7
6
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
7
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
10
4
2
2
2
2
14
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
101
27
9
8
7- 6
5
5
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
92
41
36
30
30
27
25
25
22
20
18
17
15
14
14
14
13
13
12
11
11
11
11
10
10
10
10
8
8
7
7
7
7
6
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
84
51
48
33
27
25
24
23
23
23
22
22
21
21
21
20
20
19
19
19
19
19
18
18
18
18
18
18
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
16
16
16
16
15
15
15
15
15
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
9
9
9
8
8
8
8
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
26
2
11
3
6
4
3
3
3
63
24
24
19
18
14
14
11
7
7
7
7
6
6
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
17
9
7
7
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Never seen before · 481
lowest signal
ethos:Untrusted< 800Questionable800–1199Neutral1200–1399Known1400–1599Established1600–1799Reputable1800–1999Exemplary2000–2199Distinguished2200–2399Revered2400–2599Renowned2600+Never seen before