Near
1595 Known
(@nearprotocol OR $NEAR) -is:retweet
1165
Questionable
≈ avg
avg ethos(553 never seen before)
2872
supporters
82.1/day· 3.6× avg
567
skeptics
16.2/day· 4.7× avg
7211
positive tweets
206/day· 3.8× avg
1158
negative tweets
33.1/day· 4.3× avg
15041
tweets scanned
430/day· 2.9× avg
2026-05-01 → 2026-06-04
window
35 days
Audience composition vs baseline(avg across 29 projects)
9%with reviews
↓ 5% below avg
75%no reviews
↑ 5% above avg
16%never seen
≈ avg
APESZNARMY · 171 followers
- @verohuitic You got data for this? If true, doesn’t matter too much tbh in the near future - many other apps will adopt near intents. You can swap any assets on any chain with $Near privately, not seen any other product do this - imo after this use case, why would you buy $Zec ov2026-06-04♥ 0↻ 0sentiment 72%
- So let me get this straight, there was a critical bug in $ZEC for years but you are selling $HYPE and $NEAR along with $ZEC🤦🏻♂️ both are separate protocols man 🤦🏻♂️2026-06-04♥ 3↻ 0sentiment 72%
- Following the critical vulnerability in $ZEC founded by using latest the Opus AI model, $NEAR is probably easily the best AI X Privacy token in Crypto - hope $ZEC can recover from this though2026-06-04♥ 2↻ 0sentiment 75%
- $NEAR will dominate AI and Privacy, $XMR and $ZEC holders this is your time to rotate2026-06-04♥ 0↻ 0sentiment 85%
- It’s absolutely criminal that $NEAR isn’t in Cryptos top 10 in market cap yet, accumulate aggressively https://t.co/znMNdNH3gv2026-06-04♥ 2↻ 0sentiment 92%
- $SOL $41 billion market cap currently $NEAR $3 billion market cap currently Biggest fundamental price gap in history, buy $NEAR2026-06-04♥ 2↻ 0sentiment 88%
- $NEAR recovery will be instant, buy all dips; $20 incoming soon.2026-06-04♥ 2↻ 0sentiment 80%
- If you missed $HYPE (so far) $ZEC (so far), $NEAR (so far), $WLD (so far); $FET is next and hasn’t run yet. It is the perfect combination of AI X Privacy. Accumulate aggressively. $1 incoming soon.2026-06-03♥ 2↻ 0sentiment 68%
- I’ll be real here, $HYPE should be top 5 Cryptos at a minimum and it shouldn’t be 5th. It is much more valuable than $XRP, $NEAR should be top 10 and then $FET top 20 atleast.2026-05-26♥ 1↻ 0sentiment 70%
- $FET is humanity’s world super computer and super artificial intelligence. FET is heavily undervalued + heavily mispriced versus $NEAR + $TAO. A 6-7x to NEAR + TAO’s current market cap. NEAR itself it mispriced at its current valuation, should be $10 billion+. Accumulate AI coins2026-05-26♥ 6↻ 0sentiment 75%
- @blknoiz06 @KSimback leaders in the AI category are $NEAR ($3.5 billion market cap), $TAO ($3.1 billion market cap), $VVV ($840 million market cap) and $FET ($525 million market cap). $FET the most undervalued here, but yes all these tokens could do a 10-100x minimum; all super u2026-05-25♥ 4↻ 0sentiment 75%
- @blknoiz06 $VVV, $Near, $Fet, $Pengu (AI narrative will kick in I think as volumes on PenguBot grows)2026-05-25♥ 1↻ 0sentiment 70%
- Next $NEAR, $HYPE and $ZEC is $PENGU. We had $DOGE in 2020-2021 🐕, $PEPE 2023-2024 🐸, and now $PENGU 2026-2027 🐧❄️; Buy some pudgy PENGU, Accumulate daily, HODL, Huddle together with the PENGU army, and spread the word; PENGU is the next Dogecoin 🐧💹 https://t.co/HS3UcrOQu42026-05-24♥ 3↻ 0sentiment 65%
Supporters · 2872
ranked by ethos (highest first) · click any face
Recognized · 260
No Ethos reviews · 2131
lower signal
3
10
2
2
4
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
7
12
7
2
5
3
2
2
4
2
2
13
6
4
3
9
5
3
2
2
3
5
11
6
10
8
2
2
2
2
9
2
5
4
4
2
2
7
3
2
2
2
12
6
16
13
10
7
6
6
6
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
3
3
2
11
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
8
6
5
2
2
2
19
5
4
4
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
23
10
7
5
4
4
2
2
2
29
12
5
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
15
5
5
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
7
6
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
6
6
6
5
5
4
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
26
16
12
11
9
9
7
7
7
6
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
7
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
10
4
2
2
2
2
14
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
101
27
9
8
7
6
5
5
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
92
41
36
30
30
27
25
25
22
20
18
17
15
14
14
14
13
13
12
11
11
11
11
10
10
10
10
8
8
7
7
7
7
6
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
84
51
48
33
27
25
24
23
23
23
22
22
21
21
21
20
20
19
19
19
19
19
18
18
18
18
18
18
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
16
16
16
16
15
15
15
15
15
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
13- 13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
9
9
9
8
8
8
8
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
26
2
11
3
6
4
3
3
3
63
24
24
19
18
14
14
11
7
7
7
7
6
6
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
17
9
7
7
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Never seen before · 481
lowest signal
ethos:Untrusted< 800Questionable800–1199Neutral1200–1399Known1400–1599Established1600–1799Reputable1800–1999Exemplary2000–2199Distinguished2200–2399Revered2400–2599Renowned2600+Never seen before