Kled
1184 Questionable
(@useKled OR $KLED) -is:retweet
1105
Questionable
↓ -65 below avg
avg ethos(57 never seen before)
135
supporters
27.0/day· ≈ avg
0
skeptics
0.00/day· 0.00× avg
180
positive tweets
36.0/day· 34% below avg
0
negative tweets
0.00/day· 0.00× avg
711
tweets scanned
142/day· ≈ avg
2026-05-14 → 2026-05-18
window
5 days
Audience composition vs baseline(avg across 29 projects)
7%with reviews
↓ 7% below avg
51%no reviews
↓ 19% below avg
42%never seen
↑ 26% above avg
Jawsh ooo ah · 83 followers
- @e_xen0 @avipat_ @chameleon_jeff @useKled @solana Slight correction, it was not valued at 35 million, they were given 31.2 million a seed. The actual valuation would be many multiples higher. 31m is just straight cash. Take into consideration that KLED had a 280m valuation with 12026-05-18♥ 4↻ 0sentiment 72%
- What does this mean for $KLED as a company? Incredibly bullish. Someone willing to back a copycat that is terrible and give them 31 million on a bet they know will likely fail. Shows the value and how successful KLED will be as a company. Competition means ur doing it right2026-05-15♥ 8↻ 1sentiment 75%
Supporters · 135
ranked by ethos (highest first) · click any face
Recognized · 9
No Ethos reviews · 69
lower signal
Never seen before · 57
lowest signal
ethos:Untrusted< 800Questionable800–1199Neutral1200–1399Known1400–1599Established1600–1799Reputable1800–1999Exemplary2000–2199Distinguished2200–2399Revered2400–2599Renowned2600+Never seen before