Arcium
1624 Established
(@arcium OR $ARX) -is:retweet
1211
Neutral
↑ +40 above avg
avg ethos(72 never seen before)
1048
supporters
36.1/day· 54% above avg
92
skeptics
3.2/day· ≈ avg
2513
positive tweets
86.7/day· 54% above avg
163
negative tweets
5.6/day· 28% below avg
7099
tweets scanned
245/day· 63% above avg
2026-05-11 → 2026-06-08
window
29 days
Audience composition vs baseline(avg across 31 projects)
26%with reviews
↑ 12% above avg
68%no reviews
↓ 3% below avg
6%never seen
↓ 9% below avg
EL · 544 followers
- @Ghost_Trader9 @loosty @Arcium Bigger opportunities ahead fam2026-06-03♥ 0↻ 0sentiment 65%
- Day one chad☂️ 15+ RTG's Top tier dapps Video content Hand drawn content Top tier articles on Medium and substack Credits burnt learning new concepts All within the span of three months with sleepless nights... Thank you Ser @loosty, @Arcium and to the team💜🥂 https://t.co/tw6P2026-06-02♥ 50↻ 3sentiment 75%
- Finally now I can step out of the house after being </encrypted> for three days while waiting for this It's tine for @Arcium It's gMPC time2026-05-26♥ 8↻ 0sentiment 85%
- Village of the hidden rain but it's always raining seems they aren't encrypted enough They need some @Arcium https://t.co/0KQPXfokJS2026-05-15♥ 6↻ 0sentiment 70%
- Playing in Arx mode💜☂️ I sketched “ARX” and edited it in three different styles trying to capture the clean, encrypted futuristic vibe of Arcium Hyped up for what is coming next.. gMPC Which one do you like best? 👇 @Arcium https://t.co/lFdrYZ6H7l2026-05-14♥ 12↻ 1sentiment 75%
- Building with @arcium has been amazing Funny how I started building privately with arcium took me a while to get fully orientated but was worth it and documentation was really helpful Here are my recent builds to test privacy https://t.co/UI7DH7yANG https://t.co/pXtANOL0sJ gMPC2026-05-12♥ 7↻ 0sentiment 80%
Supporters · 1048
ranked by ethos (highest first) · click any face
Recognized · 285
12
2
3
3
2
4
13
4
2
6
14
20
5
2
6
2
3
2
3
3
2
2
6
6
4
4
2
4
6
6
2
2
7
4
2
3
5
4
2
2
2
5
5
7
2
2
36
4
3
6
3
3
14
13
3
12
13
4
3
2
2
3
3
2
6
2
2
4
7
6
2
3
3
15
3
5
2
2
2
2
10
7
3
2
2
4
6
10
5
2
2
7
4
4
3
3
17
4
3
2
2
7
30
3
3
30
5
3
2
2
34
6
10
4
2
6
4
4
3
2
2
2
4
4
6
3
2
10
9
6
2
2
8
3
No Ethos reviews · 702
lower signal
2
3
9
6
2
7
2
3
2
2
2
4
2
9
7
3
16
3
2
18
20
15
8
6
4
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
4
2
2
5
3
2
6
2
2
19
4
3
2
2
5
2
2
4
3
2
2
2
2
25
4
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
29
6
6
5
5
4
4
4
3
2
2
2
2
14
8
7
5
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
7
3
2
13
10
6
6
5
5
4
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
10
9
8
7
5
4
4
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
20
13
8
8
6
6
6
5
5
5
4
4
4
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
16
9
9
7
5
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
23
17
11
9
9
8
7
6
6- 6
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
2
2
2
2
6
5
4
4
3
3
7
7
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Never seen before · 61
lowest signal
ethos:Untrusted< 800Questionable800–1199Neutral1200–1399Known1400–1599Established1600–1799Reputable1800–1999Exemplary2000–2199Distinguished2200–2399Revered2400–2599Renowned2600+Never seen before